跳到正文

系统化问题排查

从复现与证据检查开始,逐步确定问题原因,再验证修正结果。

开源精选产品研发14 个文件299,499 Stars浏览次数 8obra/superpowers MIT版本 bb92a77
开始使用

下载前阅读 SKILL.md 中的使用条件,并确认所用工具支持对应能力。

输入资料
实际报错和复现操作 相关代码与运行条件 阅读本节完整说明
交付内容
原因分析 修正与回归检查 阅读本节完整说明
  1. 获取完整包,保留配套文件的目录结构。
  2. 按照原文准备所需工具、依赖与输入资料。
  3. 阅读对应使用步骤与输入输出说明,在自己的环境中验证结果。

使用提示摘自原文,配套文件保留来源版本;实际运行条件以各包说明为准。

正文

获取原文件

condition-based-waiting.md

Overview

Flaky tests often guess at timing with arbitrary delays. This creates race conditions where tests pass on fast machines but fail under load or in CI.

Core principle: Wait for the actual condition you care about, not a guess about how long it takes.

When to Use

digraph when_to_use {
    "Test uses setTimeout/sleep?" [shape=diamond];
    "Testing timing behavior?" [shape=diamond];
    "Document WHY timeout needed" [shape=box];
    "Use condition-based waiting" [shape=box];

    "Test uses setTimeout/sleep?" -> "Testing timing behavior?" [label="yes"];
    "Testing timing behavior?" -> "Document WHY timeout needed" [label="yes"];
    "Testing timing behavior?" -> "Use condition-based waiting" [label="no"];
}

Use when:

  • Tests have arbitrary delays (setTimeout, sleep, time.sleep())
  • Tests are flaky (pass sometimes, fail under load)
  • Tests timeout when run in parallel
  • Waiting for async operations to complete

Don't use when:

  • Testing actual timing behavior (debounce, throttle intervals)
  • Always document WHY if using arbitrary timeout

Core Pattern

// ❌ BEFORE: Guessing at timing
await new Promise(r => setTimeout(r, 50));
const result = getResult();
expect(result).toBeDefined();

// ✅ AFTER: Waiting for condition
await waitFor(() => getResult() !== undefined);
const result = getResult();
expect(result).toBeDefined();

Quick Patterns

Scenario Pattern
Wait for event waitFor(() => events.find(e => e.type === 'DONE'))
Wait for state waitFor(() => machine.state === 'ready')
Wait for count waitFor(() => items.length >= 5)
Wait for file waitFor(() => fs.existsSync(path))
Complex condition waitFor(() => obj.ready && obj.value > 10)

Implementation

Generic polling function:

async function waitFor<T>(
  condition: () => T | undefined | null | false,
  description: string,
  timeoutMs = 5000
): Promise<T> {
  const startTime = Date.now();

  while (true) {
    const result = condition();
    if (result) return result;

    if (Date.now() - startTime > timeoutMs) {
      throw new Error(`Timeout waiting for ${description} after ${timeoutMs}ms`);
    }

    await new Promise(r => setTimeout(r, 10)); // Poll every 10ms
  }
}

See condition-based-waiting-example.ts in this directory for complete implementation with domain-specific helpers (waitForEvent, waitForEventCount, waitForEventMatch) from actual debugging session.

Common Mistakes

❌ Polling too fast: setTimeout(check, 1) - wastes CPU ✅ Fix: Poll every 10ms

❌ No timeout: Loop forever if condition never met ✅ Fix: Always include timeout with clear error

❌ Stale data: Cache state before loop ✅ Fix: Call getter inside loop for fresh data

When Arbitrary Timeout IS Correct

// Tool ticks every 100ms - need 2 ticks to verify partial output
await waitForEvent(manager, 'TOOL_STARTED'); // First: wait for condition
await new Promise(r => setTimeout(r, 200));   // Then: wait for timed behavior
// 200ms = 2 ticks at 100ms intervals - documented and justified

Requirements:

  1. First wait for triggering condition
  2. Based on known timing (not guessing)
  3. Comment explaining WHY

Real-World Impact

From debugging session (2025-10-03):

  • Fixed 15 flaky tests across 3 files
  • Pass rate: 60% → 100%
  • Execution time: 40% faster
  • No more race conditions

CONTACT HAONAN

联系haonan

医疗 AI · 产品与独立开发

刘浩南

关注医疗 AI 从 demo 到真实落地,聚焦产品化、商业化与院内工作流效率提升。

12年医疗产研经验,大湾区头部医疗AI公司前产品总监,独立开发者

医疗 AI 产品化医疗 AI 商业化院内工作流效率
刘浩南的微信联系二维码
微信扫一扫,联系 haonan