跳到正文

临床研究评估与证据追溯

为汇总层面的临床研究整理证据、评价、模型和治理材料,提供 GRADE 资料与逻辑追溯检查;适用研究用途。

开源精选医疗业务31 个文件50,135 Stars浏览次数 0K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills MIT版本 a1043ef
开始使用

适用环境:Python 3.11+; local files only; bundled scripts use the standard library and require no network, credentials, API keys, LLMs, or image services.

输入资料
汇总或原文允许的研究材料 预先明确的研究问题与评价目标 阅读本节完整说明
交付内容
研究评价与证据资料 来源、限制与人工复核清单 阅读本节完整说明
  1. 获取完整包,保留配套文件的目录结构。
  2. 按照原文准备所需工具、依赖与输入资料。
  3. 阅读对应使用步骤与输入输出说明,在自己的环境中验证结果。

使用提示摘自原文,配套文件保留来源版本;实际运行条件以各包说明为准。

正文

获取原文件

references/safety_and_scope.md

Intended Use

Use this skill only to create or check research, evaluation, documentation, and governance artifacts from synthetic or aggregate data.

Acceptable examples:

  • an intended-use statement for a retrospective model evaluation;
  • an aggregate subgroup performance report;
  • a statistical analysis plan;
  • a GRADE evidence-profile shell for a human panel;
  • a release-gate traceability matrix;
  • a de-identification process checklist.

Prohibited Use

Do not:

  • accept or produce a record about a person;
  • infer a diagnosis, prognosis, phenotype, biomarker class, or eligibility for a person;
  • recommend or compare care options for a person;
  • provide medication, dose, schedule, monitoring, or contraindication instructions;
  • triage, assign urgency, create an alarm, or suggest escalation;
  • deploy logic in an EHR, bedside tool, portal, order set, or alerting workflow;
  • represent output as clinical advice, a validated medical device, or an authorized clinical system;
  • claim legal, regulatory, quality-system, or HIPAA compliance.

No disclaimer makes an otherwise prohibited workflow acceptable.

Stop Conditions

Stop and do not process the input when any of the following is present:

  • names, record numbers, contact details, precise locations, or person-linked dates;
  • row-level records, timelines, notes, images, signals, or sequences;
  • a request about “this patient,” “this result,” or an individual case;
  • instructions to choose a therapy, test, dose, disposition, or urgency;
  • instructions to push output to a live clinical system;
  • an assertion that passing a checklist proves authorization or compliance.

Explain the boundary briefly. For care, direct the requester to a licensed healthcare professional and locally validated, appropriately authorized systems. For privacy, regulatory, or legal determinations, direct them to qualified organizational reviewers.

Required Intended-Use Elements

An artifact is incomplete unless it states:

  1. Purpose — the specific research or governance question.
  2. Users — named roles, not “clinicians” broadly.
  3. Population scope — aggregate cohort or synthetic data only.
  4. Decision role — descriptive, evaluative, or governance support.
  5. Excluded uses — every prohibited use above.
  6. Data level — aggregate or synthetic, with no PHI/raw rows supplied.
  7. Limitations — known gaps, assumptions, transportability, and failure modes.
  8. Human review — required roles and approval status.
  9. Versioning — owner, version, release date, changes, and retirement criteria.
  10. Monitoring — drift, calibration, subgroup performance, incidents, and review cadence when applicable.

Human Review Matrix

Artifact Minimum review roles
Evidence profile systematic-review methodologist; domain experts; panel chair
Cohort report statistician/epidemiologist; data steward; domain expert
Survival plan statistician with time-to-event expertise; domain expert
Model/biomarker evaluation prediction-model methodologist; assay/domain expert; fairness reviewer
Privacy checklist privacy official or qualified de-identification expert
Logic traceability system owner; independent validator; governance approver
Regulatory context qualified legal/regulatory counsel

Review completion must be recorded by the responsible organization. The scripts do not authenticate reviewers or approvals.

Safe Language

Prefer:

  • “The aggregate evaluation estimated…”
  • “Performance differed across evaluated subgroups; causes and practical importance require review.”
  • “The evidence panel judged certainty as…; rationale and sources are recorded.”
  • “This checklist is complete; it is not a compliance determination.”
  • “External validation has not been performed.”

Avoid:

  • “The model is safe/fair/clinically valid.”
  • “This biomarker means the patient should…”
  • “The tool is FDA compliant/approved.”
  • “The dataset is HIPAA compliant.”
  • “The recommendation is Grade 1A” without the framework, panel process, outcome-specific judgments, and source trail.

Audit Trail

Record:

  • immutable artifact ID and version;
  • source versions and access dates;
  • data provenance and cut date;
  • code version and command;
  • declared thresholds before analysis;
  • reviewer roles, dates, decisions, and unresolved objections;
  • change reason, validation evidence, rollback plan, and retirement decision.

Do not put secrets, credentials, or patient information in audit logs.

CONTACT HAONAN

联系haonan

医疗 AI · 产品与独立开发

刘浩南

关注医疗 AI 从 demo 到真实落地,聚焦产品化、商业化与院内工作流效率提升。

12年医疗产研经验,大湾区头部医疗AI公司前产品总监,独立开发者

医疗 AI 产品化医疗 AI 商业化院内工作流效率
刘浩南的微信联系二维码
微信扫一扫,联系 haonan