正文
获取原文件references/analysis-framework.md
Deep analysis framework applying instructional design principles to infographic creation.
Purpose
Before creating an infographic, thoroughly analyze the source material to:
- Understand the content at a deep level
- Identify clear learning objectives for the viewer
- Structure information for maximum clarity and retention
- Match content to optimal layout×style combinations
- Preserve all source data verbatim
Instructional Design Mindset
Approach content analysis as a world-class instructional designer:
| Principle | Application |
|---|---|
| Deep Understanding | Read the entire document before analyzing any part |
| Learner-Centered | Focus on what the viewer needs to understand |
| Visual Storytelling | Use visuals to communicate, not just decorate |
| Cognitive Load | Simplify complex ideas without losing accuracy |
| Data Integrity | Never alter, summarize, or paraphrase source facts |
Analysis Dimensions
1. Content Type Classification
| Type | Characteristics | Best Layout | Best Style |
|---|---|---|---|
| Timeline/History | Sequential events, dates, progression | linear-progression | craft-handmade, aged-academia |
| Process/Tutorial | Step-by-step instructions, how-to | linear-progression, winding-roadmap | ikea-manual, technical-schematic |
| Comparison | A vs B, pros/cons, before-after | binary-comparison, comparison-matrix | corporate-memphis, bold-graphic |
| Hierarchy | Levels, priorities, pyramids | hierarchical-layers, tree-branching | craft-handmade, corporate-memphis |
| Relationships | Connections, overlaps, influences | venn-diagram, hub-spoke, jigsaw | craft-handmade, subway-map |
| Data/Metrics | Statistics, KPIs, measurements | dashboard, periodic-table | corporate-memphis, technical-schematic |
| Cycle/Loop | Recurring processes, feedback loops | circular-flow | craft-handmade, technical-schematic |
| System/Structure | Components, architecture, anatomy | structural-breakdown, bento-grid | technical-schematic, ikea-manual |
| Journey/Narrative | Stories, user flows, milestones | winding-roadmap, story-mountain | storybook-watercolor, comic-strip |
| Overview/Summary | Multiple topics, feature highlights | bento-grid, periodic-table, dense-modules | chalkboard, bold-graphic |
| Product/Buying Guide | Multi-dimension comparisons, specs, pitfalls | dense-modules | morandi-journal, pop-laboratory, retro-pop-grid, retro-popup-pop |
2. Learning Objective Identification
Every infographic should have 1-3 clear learning objectives.
Good Learning Objectives:
- Specific and measurable
- Focus on what the viewer will understand, not just see
- Written from the viewer's perspective
Format: "After viewing this infographic, the viewer will understand..."
| Content Aspect | Objective Type |
|---|---|
| Core concept | "...what [topic] is and why it matters" |
| Process | "...how to [accomplish something]" |
| Comparison | "...the key differences between [A] and [B]" |
| Relationships | "...how [elements] connect to each other" |
| Data | "...the significance of [key statistics]" |
3. Audience Analysis
| Factor | Questions | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Knowledge Level | What do they already know? | Determines complexity depth |
| Context | Why are they viewing this? | Determines emphasis points |
| Expectations | What do they hope to learn? | Determines success criteria |
| Visual Preferences | Professional, playful, technical? | Influences style choice |
4. Complexity Assessment
| Level | Indicators | Layout Recommendation |
|---|---|---|
| Simple (3-5 points) | Few main concepts, clear relationships | sparse layouts, single focus |
| Moderate (6-8 points) | Multiple concepts, some relationships | balanced layouts, clear sections |
| Complex (9+ points) | Many concepts, intricate relationships | dense layouts, multiple sections |
5. Visual Opportunity Mapping
Identify what can be shown rather than told:
| Content Element | Visual Treatment |
|---|---|
| Numbers/Statistics | Large, highlighted numerals |
| Comparisons | Side-by-side, split screen |
| Processes | Arrows, numbered steps, flow |
| Hierarchies | Pyramids, layers, size differences |
| Relationships | Lines, connections, overlapping shapes |
| Categories | Color coding, grouping, sections |
| Timelines | Horizontal/vertical progression |
| Quotes | Callout boxes, quotation marks |
6. Data Verbatim Extraction
Critical: All factual information must be preserved exactly as written in the source.
| Data Type | Handling Rule |
|---|---|
| Statistics | Copy exactly: "73%" not "about 70%" |
| Quotes | Copy word-for-word with attribution |
| Names | Preserve exact spelling |
| Dates | Keep original format |
| Technical Terms | Do not simplify or substitute |
| Lists | Preserve order and wording |
Never:
- Round numbers
- Paraphrase quotes
- Substitute simpler words
- Add implied information
- Remove context that affects meaning
Output Format
Save analysis results to analysis.md:
---
title: "[Main topic title]"
topic: "[educational/technical/business/creative/etc.]"
data_type: "[timeline/hierarchy/comparison/process/etc.]"
complexity: "[simple/moderate/complex]"
point_count: [number of main points]
source_language: "[detected language]"
user_language: "[user's language]"
---
## Main Topic
[1-2 sentence summary of what this content is about]
## Learning Objectives
After viewing this infographic, the viewer should understand:
1. [Primary objective]
2. [Secondary objective]
3. [Tertiary objective if applicable]
## Target Audience
- **Knowledge Level**: [Beginner/Intermediate/Expert]
- **Context**: [Why they're viewing this]
- **Expectations**: [What they hope to learn]
## Content Type Analysis
- **Data Structure**: [How information relates to itself]
- **Key Relationships**: [What connects to what]
- **Visual Opportunities**: [What can be shown rather than told]
## Key Data Points (Verbatim)
[All statistics, quotes, and critical facts exactly as they appear in source]
- "[Exact data point 1]"
- "[Exact data point 2]"
- "[Exact quote with attribution]"
## Layout × Style Signals
- Content type: [type] → suggests [layout]
- Tone: [tone] → suggests [style]
- Audience: [audience] → suggests [style]
- Complexity: [level] → suggests [layout density]
## Design Instructions (from user input)
[Any style, color, layout, or visual preferences extracted from user's steering prompt]
## Recommended Combinations
1. **[Layout] + [Style]** (Recommended): [Brief rationale]
2. **[Layout] + [Style]**: [Brief rationale]
3. **[Layout] + [Style]**: [Brief rationale]
Analysis Checklist
Before proceeding to structured content generation:
- Have I read the entire source document?
- Can I summarize the main topic in 1-2 sentences?
- Have I identified 1-3 clear learning objectives?
- Do I understand the target audience?
- Have I classified the content type correctly?
- Have I extracted all data points verbatim?
- Have I identified visual opportunities?
- Have I extracted design instructions from user input?
- Have I recommended 3 layout×style combinations?