跳到正文

Axton:Mermaid 知识可视化

将文字资料转成 Mermaid 流程、时序、状态或概念图,结合常见语法检查组织图表。

开源精选知识加工5 个文件3,649 Stars浏览次数 0axtonliu/axton-obsidian-visual-skills MIT版本 1265976
开始使用

下载前阅读 SKILL.md 中的使用条件,并确认所用工具支持对应能力。

输入资料
流程或概念资料 图表类型与展示要求 阅读本节完整说明
交付内容
Mermaid 图表源文件 布局与语法检查 阅读本节完整说明
  1. 获取完整包,保留配套文件的目录结构。
  2. 按照原文准备所需工具、依赖与输入资料。
  3. 阅读对应使用步骤与输入输出说明,在自己的环境中验证结果。

使用提示摘自原文,配套文件保留来源版本;实际运行条件以各包说明为准。

正文

获取原文件

SKILL.md

中文导读

将文字资料转成 Mermaid 流程、时序、状态或概念图,结合常见语法检查组织图表。

作者:Axton。

输入材料

  • 流程或概念资料
  • 图表类型与展示要求

交付结果

  • Mermaid 图表源文件
  • 布局与语法检查

阅读与使用

本页保存指定版本的原始 Skill 和配套文件,可查看中文导读、原文与参考资料。获取完整包后,按原文准备所需工具与材料。

来源仓库为 axtonliu/axton-obsidian-visual-skills,采用 MIT 许可。Stars 表示仓库关注度,核验日期为 2026-10-15。分类表示适用的工作环节,实际执行条件以原文为准。

原始 Skill

Overview

Convert text content into clean, professional Mermaid diagrams optimized for presentations and documentation. Automatically handles common syntax pitfalls (list syntax conflicts, subgraph naming, spacing issues) to ensure diagrams render correctly in Obsidian, GitHub, and other Mermaid-compatible platforms.

Quick Start

When creating a Mermaid diagram:

  1. Analyze the content - Identify key concepts, relationships, and flow
  2. Choose diagram type - Select the most appropriate visualization (see Diagram Types below)
  3. Select configuration - Determine layout, detail level, and styling
  4. Generate diagram - Create syntactically correct Mermaid code
  5. Output in markdown - Wrap in proper code fence with optional explanation

Default assumptions:

  • Vertical layout (TB) unless horizontal requested
  • Medium detail level (balanced between simplicity and information)
  • Professional color scheme with semantic colors
  • Obsidian/GitHub compatible syntax

Diagram Types

1. Process Flow (graph TB/LR)

Best for: Workflows, decision trees, sequential processes, AI agent architectures

Use when: Content describes steps, stages, or a sequence of actions

Key features:

  • Swimlanes via subgraph for grouping related steps
  • Arrow labels for transitions
  • Feedback loops and branches
  • Color-coded stages

Configuration options:

  • layout: "vertical" (TB), "horizontal" (LR)
  • detail: "simple" (core steps only), "standard" (with descriptions), "detailed" (with annotations)
  • style: "minimal", "professional", "colorful"

2. Circular Flow (graph TD with circular layout)

Best for: Cyclic processes, continuous improvement loops, agent feedback systems

Use when: Content emphasizes iteration, feedback, or circular relationships

Key features:

  • Central hub with radiating elements
  • Curved feedback arrows
  • Clear cycle indicators

3. Comparison Diagram (graph TB with parallel paths)

Best for: Before/after comparisons, A vs B analysis, traditional vs modern systems

Use when: Content contrasts two or more approaches or systems

Key features:

  • Side-by-side layout
  • Central comparison node
  • Clear differentiation via color/style

4. Mindmap

Best for: Hierarchical concepts, knowledge organization, topic breakdowns

Use when: Content is hierarchical with clear parent-child relationships

Key features:

  • Radial tree structure
  • Multiple levels of nesting
  • Clean visual hierarchy

5. Sequence Diagram

Best for: Interactions between components, API calls, message flows

Use when: Content involves communication between actors/systems over time

Key features:

  • Timeline-based layout
  • Clear actor separation
  • Activation boxes for processes

6. State Diagram

Best for: System states, status transitions, lifecycle stages

Use when: Content describes states and transitions between them

Key features:

  • Clear state nodes
  • Labeled transitions
  • Start and end states

Critical Syntax Rules

Always follow these rules to prevent parsing errors:

Rule 1: Avoid List Syntax Conflicts

❌ WRONG: [1. Perception]       → Triggers "Unsupported markdown: list"
✅ RIGHT: [1.Perception]         → Remove space after period
✅ RIGHT: [① Perception]         → Use circled numbers (①②③④⑤⑥⑦⑧⑨⑩)
✅ RIGHT: [(1) Perception]       → Use parentheses
✅ RIGHT: [Step 1: Perception]   → Use "Step" prefix

Rule 2: Subgraph Naming

❌ WRONG: subgraph AI Agent Core  → Space in name without quotes
✅ RIGHT: subgraph agent["AI Agent Core"]  → Use ID with display name
✅ RIGHT: subgraph agent          → Use simple ID only

Rule 3: Node References

❌ WRONG: Title --> AI Agent Core  → Reference display name directly
✅ RIGHT: Title --> agent          → Reference subgraph ID

Rule 4: Special Characters in Node Text

✅ Use quotes for text with spaces: ["Text with spaces"]
✅ Escape or avoid: quotation marks → use 『』instead
✅ Escape or avoid: parentheses → use 「」instead
✅ Line breaks in circle nodes only: ((Text<br/>Break))

Rule 5: Arrow Types

  • --> solid arrow
  • -.-> dashed arrow (for supporting systems, optional paths)
  • ==> thick arrow (for emphasis)
  • ~~~ invisible link (for layout only)

For complete syntax reference and edge cases, see references/syntax-rules.md

Configuration Options

All diagrams accept these parameters:

Layout:

  • direction: "vertical" (TB), "horizontal" (LR), "right-to-left" (RL), "bottom-to-top" (BT)
  • aspect: "portrait" (default), "landscape" (wide), "square"

Detail Level:

  • simple: Core elements only, minimal labels
  • standard: Balanced detail with key descriptions (default)
  • detailed: Full annotations, explanations, and metadata
  • presentation: Optimized for slides (larger text, fewer details)

Style:

  • minimal: Monochrome, clean lines
  • professional: Semantic colors, clear hierarchy (default)
  • colorful: Vibrant colors, high contrast
  • academic: Formal styling for papers/documentation

Additional Options:

  • show_legend: true/false - Include color/symbol legend
  • numbered: true/false - Add sequence numbers to steps
  • title: string - Add diagram title

Example Usage Patterns

Pattern 1: Basic request

User: "Visualize the software development lifecycle"
Response: [Analyze → Choose graph TB → Generate with standard detail]

Pattern 2: With configuration

User: "Create a horizontal flowchart of our sales process with lots of detail"
Response: [Analyze → Choose graph LR → Generate with detailed level]

Pattern 3: Comparison

User: "Compare traditional AI vs AI agents"
Response: [Analyze → Choose comparison layout → Generate with contrasting styles]

Workflow

  1. Understand the content

    • Identify main concepts, entities, and relationships
    • Determine hierarchy or sequence
    • Note any comparisons or contrasts
  2. Select diagram type

    • Match content structure to diagram type
    • Consider user's presentation context
    • Default to process flow if ambiguous
  3. Choose configuration

    • Apply user-specified options
    • Use sensible defaults for unspecified options
    • Optimize for readability
  4. Generate Mermaid code

    • Follow all syntax rules strictly
    • Use semantic naming (descriptive IDs)
    • Apply consistent styling
    • Test for common errors:
      • No "number. space" patterns in node text
      • All subgraphs use ID["display name"] format
      • All node references use IDs not display names
  5. Output with context

    • Wrap in ```mermaid code fence
    • Add brief explanation of diagram structure
    • Mention rendering compatibility (Obsidian, GitHub, etc.)
    • Offer to adjust or create variations

Color Scheme Defaults

Standard professional palette:

  • Green (#d3f9d8/#2f9e44): Input, perception, start states
  • Red (#ffe3e3/#c92a2a): Planning, decision points
  • Purple (#e5dbff/#5f3dc4): Processing, reasoning
  • Orange (#ffe8cc/#d9480f): Actions, tool usage
  • Cyan (#c5f6fa/#0c8599): Output, execution, results
  • Yellow (#fff4e6/#e67700): Storage, memory, data
  • Pink (#f3d9fa/#862e9c): Learning, optimization
  • Blue (#e7f5ff/#1971c2): Metadata, definitions, titles
  • Gray (#f8f9fa/#868e96): Neutral elements, traditional systems

Common Patterns

Swimlane Pattern (Grouping)

graph TB
    subgraph core["Core Process"]
        A --> B --> C
    end
    subgraph support["Supporting Systems"]
        D
        E
    end
    core -.-> support

Feedback Loop Pattern

graph TB
    A[Start] --> B[Process]
    B --> C[End]
    C -.->|Feedback| A

Hub and Spoke Pattern

graph TB
    Central[Hub]
    A[Spoke 1] --> Central
    B[Spoke 2] --> Central
    C[Spoke 3] --> Central

Quality Checklist

Before outputting, verify:

  • No "number. space" patterns in any node text
  • All subgraphs use proper ID syntax
  • All arrows use correct syntax (-->, -.->)
  • Colors applied consistently
  • Layout direction specified
  • Style declarations present
  • No ambiguous node references
  • Compatible with Obsidian/GitHub renderers
  • No Emoji in any node text - use text labels or color coding instead

References

For detailed syntax rules and troubleshooting, see:

CONTACT HAONAN

联系haonan

医疗 AI · 产品与独立开发

刘浩南

关注医疗 AI 从 demo 到真实落地,聚焦产品化、商业化与院内工作流效率提升。

12年医疗产研经验,大湾区头部医疗AI公司前产品总监,独立开发者

医疗 AI 产品化医疗 AI 商业化院内工作流效率
刘浩南的微信联系二维码
微信扫一扫,联系 haonan